“It is necessary to begin where the world is if we are going to change it to what we think it should be. That means working in the system.” Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals
It is no secret that Obama admired and probably modeled parts of his life after Saul Alinsky. For his entire life Obama has been surrounded by socialists. His closest friends, mentors, colleagues, appointees, and plenty of his supporters believe they are entitled to the possessions of others. His platform, policy, and actions have all endeavored toward taking from the “wealthiest of America” and giving it to entitlement programs. And yet, he and his supporters claim he is not a Socialist, mocking and deriding those that make the claim. If it looks a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck…it’s a golden retriever?
Regardless of whether a person admits to their very nature, or even if they deny that nature, their actions are the product with which we must measure. Given the quote above from Alinsky and wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing act, this is the only reliable litmus test.
In my writings you may have noticed that I rail against Government intrusion into our freedoms and rights. Like all of you, I have been thinking a lot about our Government. Lately it dawns on me that this is not at all our Government, because our Government is defined by the Constitution. Who among you believe this is the Government described and defined by our Founding Fathers?
If you read the Constitution you will find the foundation and limitations of our Government. What we have now is becoming less recognizable to that standard. The elected officials in Washington DC are wearing the cloak of Government, but they are not acting in accordance to the Constitution.
A good friend of mine often says that abuse is defined as the abnormal use of something. By this definition, those operating outside the parameters of the principles contained in the Constitution are indeed abusing the powers afforded by the People. As such, departure from what is normal necessarily makes that person a radical, or revolutionary.
Recently I have heard much talk about the need for people who believe in the Constitution to stand up and have a revolution. I know it is a matter of mere semantics, but that idea is completely wrong. Standing up and defending what should be the standard does not make a person a radical or revolutionary. On the other hand, those that desire “change” or “fundamentally transformation” have openly declared revolt against our standard of Government.
Of course the politicians and their propagandists in the lamestream media would have America believing that “right-wing extremists” (people I would call Constitutional Patriots) are the problem. Further they take the stance of victim, who needs to defend their position from such radicals or revolutionaries. However, I do not believe myself involved in a revolution, nor do I consider myself a radical.
Do not take me the wrong way, I think it is great that so many Americans have finally had enough and have decided to stand up against this “long train of abuses.” People will suffer a good long while before they have had enough. Even the Declaration of Independence, recognized this about humans, stating:
“…accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”
But why do those who believe in the foundations upon which the great nation was built have to take the role of offender? As if we are engaged in treasonous activity? No, I will not submit to the propaganda these usurpers dictate. They are indeed the radicals and revolutionaries! They have conducted a lengthy coup d’état by lulling the “sheeple” of this nation into a herd that has rallied behind them. These despicable Pied Pipers have played a tune of socialized entitlements and the rats have fallen in step. Take your pick of imagery, too many Americans have fallen under their thrall and seemingly have no desire to free themselves.
The language of Liberals has been corroding our nation like a cancer for far too long. I refuse to use “politically correct” terms. If that offends people, I don’t care. If they don’t like that my beliefs in our Republic, legal citizenship, heterosexuality, right to life, and my right to openly profess and practice my beliefs in God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit…I don’t care. If I believe that taking money from the rich and giving it to the “poor” is a load of crap…that is my right. And if I believe that the man holding the office of President is nothing that he pretends to be…that is well within my rights.
Fellow Patriots, I take special interest in what words mean. I will no longer allow the other team to dictate the playing field. There may come a time very soon when because of such Liberal language Patriots will be labeled not only as “terrorists” but also “traitors” or “treasonous.” But I ask you, who are the real traitors, who has committed treason? Is it those who desire a Government tethered to the standards set forth by our Founding Fathers? Or is it those who seek a radical departure from the precepts and principles defined in our Constitution? These Socialist revolutionaries have declared war with the citizens of the United States of America by shredding the Constitution. Who then stands on the side which is good and right?
We The People maintain that we have formed a Republican Government, under which we will peaceably reside so long as said that Government adheres to the limitations defined in Constitution. The American dream is such that every resident has been afforded the right to “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” We The People implement a Government to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence [sic], promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Prosperity.”
Anthony Wells – Molon labe!
Posted on Radical Middle, 3/25/2013