Guns Blazin’!

Okay, I know I haven’t written anything on this blog in a LONG time. However, I thought I’d throw my two cents in about the fervor over the Second Amendment. For those that pay attention, there are many things eroding the very fabric of what makes America such a great place to live. We are facing a fundamental shift in the American way of life and those in power are trying to convince you that restricting your access to protection is the best course of action. When it comes to this issue, you had better stand on the right side; else you will shackle yourself to those who mean to rule you.

Many people probably haven’t looked at the Bill of Rights since school, so here’s what the Second Amendment says;

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Before I say anything else, like everyone else, I am horrified by the mass shootings that have been occurring. Far too frequently we are hearing of crazed people intent on harming as many as possible to satisfy some part of their twisted psyche. As law abiding citizens, we will NEVER understand why such people commit atrocious acts.

In all of these tragedies, multiple laws were broken, the last of which was murder. If a person is willing to commit murder, probably the most serious crime in the law books, do you really think adding more laws regulating guns will stop them?

Anti-gun lobbyists and mainstream media present this as though it is an American phenomenon centered on a gun problem. First, a person intent on committing murder doesn’t need a gun to make that happen. Also, this is not a problem unique to America, you will find that around the globe people kill others by many methods that don’t involve firearms.

For example, let’s look at China, a country that bans guns for the public. On the same day as the Connecticut shooting, a man attacked 22 school children with a knife. Just two months before, a machete-wielding man killed 3 and injured 13 school  children. In 2010, China had five similar attacks where school children were attacked with bladed instruments. These are just a few examples. What this illustrates is a determined person will inflict carnage with whatever tool available.

The mainstream media and the progressive left would have you believe that gun owners are a threat to the American way of life. So let’s look at some numbers. Gallup polls in 2011 estimate 47% of American adults own a firearm, which means about 110 million citizens (based on 2010 Census). According FBI, 1,246,248 violent crimes occurred in the U.S. during 2010. Of those violent crimes, 14,748 were homicide or non-negligent manslaughter. What these statistics will never show, as there is no way to reliably prove, how many crimes never occurred because of gun ownership. But just for fun, let’s compare some of the numbers with a country that prohibits citizens from owning firearms. Let’s look South of the border to Mexico.

The United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime reported the following information for 2010. The data is the number of reported crimes and the rate of occurrence per 100,000 people.

Homicide Rate/100k Homicide by Firearm Rate/100k Robbery Rate/100k
USA 14,748 4.8 9,960 3.2 357,832 115.3
Mexico 25,757 22.7 11,309 10.0 738,138 650.8

The intention of this information is not to say that Mexico is a horrible place. Quite the contrary I visit Mexico often and even have many great friends (and future family) there. What I believe it does show is what I have thought for many years, if Mexican citizens had the right to bear arms, crime would decrease. I’m hoping I don’t have to go into a lengthy argument to support the idea, but I think it stands to reason that a citizen prepared to defend themselves is a criminal’s worst nightmare.

Many argue that over-sensationalizing these events by the press has been a contributing factor in their re-occurrence  Has anyone suggested that we adopt new laws or regulations for the First Amendment? Should the Government regulate free speech? Place restrictions on the freedom of the press?

There have been federal, state, and local laws concerning gun control for many years. And yet, criminals continue to commit acts of violence with guns. By definition, the only people that will obey these laws are law-abiding citizens. And they are not the threat. Taking away a law-abiding citizen’s right to defend themselves is morally repugnant and unconstitutional.

Think about this statistically. Assume the following, and yes I know what they say about making assumptions! In a population of 100,000 gun ownership is roughly 47,000. In the same population 3 or 4 people are murdered with a gun. These crimes were committed by 3 or 4 different criminals. So now you want to place restrictions on the other 46,996? And that still doesn’t guarantee the safety of people. Criminals will still have guns, or any other deadly weapon, that will kill, maim, and harm people. Criminals simply don’t care how many laws they make.

The simple fact is that you can listen to all the arguments until the end of time and only one thing really matters…people harm other people. The Bible tells us that the first murder was when Cain killed Abel. For arguments sake, since there were no guns, let’s say Cain used a rock or a club. God did not ban or restrict rocks and/or clubs; God knew that the problem was in the heart of Cain. As we are not like God and will never know what resides in the hearts of humankind, we will always be susceptible to falling prey to malignant people.

If you believe that this mob will only stop at regulation, you are blind. The platform of those seeking fundamental change has always included taking away peoples arms. Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Mao, and Pol Pot, to name a few, all seized control and took away the public’s ability to fight back. Would you so easily give up your means of defense? Why I believe the ultimate goal is removing all guns from our hands is an argument for another article. Suffice it to say though; once you cede ground, it is a bloody war to get it back.

You cannot blame guns to mollify your emotions. You want to know why this happened, who should be held responsible, how to prevent this from happening again. Those of course are the toughest of questions. Personally, I hold the American people responsible. That’s a longer conversation, but I believe that we’ve become a nation without a moral compass. Our society promotes self-interest, success at all costs, and anti-theistic views. People do as they please, blame someone else, and take no personal responsibility. And that is very telling to indicate what may be in the heart of man.

I leave you with a quote Thomas Jefferson pondered in his book Legal Commonplace Book.

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one.” Cesare Beccaria, Essay on Crimes and Punishment


About exmaninblues

I see troubling trends developing in this country and fear for its future. This blog is intended to incite others to action.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Guns Blazin’!

  1. Nathan Freeman says:

    Very impressed with the thought and knowledge you put into your answers!!!

  2. Jim Fennell says:

    great article! Too bad it’s not published in mainline newpapers across the USA. Keep up the good work.

    • exmaninblues says:

      Thank you for your comment. I’m not sure why, but it went to the spam box. Perhaps you were redirected to my page. If you like to visit directly, Thanks again!

    • James Marlow says:

      Well said as usual. I appreciate you posting the source of your information to allow readers to see what you write is not fabricated or simply your opinion. I missed reading your stuff. Glad you’re back.

  3. Chili Gallimore says:

    It would seem to most people that the second amendment was created for citizens to protect themselves from the criminal element. This is true to a certain extent. The second amendment was created to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government. A government that doesn’t trust its law abiding citizens is a government afraid of the consequences of its actions.

    • exmaninblues says:

      I have always been curious why the 2nd Amendment combines “well regulated militia” with the right to bear arms. As I researched this piece, I found out that there was a British law requiring able bodied men to participate in the militia. So, the concept would not have been foreign to the colonists. After the Revolution, the fledgling Government knew it needed well armed citizenry in the event of further problems. Which proved quite useful when we went to war with the British again in 1812. The framers of the Constitution probably had something like this in mind when drafting the Bill of Rights. But, given the circumstances of our War for Independence, you cannot rule out the necessity in the event of our own Government turning against its own citizens.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s